Difference between revisions of "Royal Commission report day 1 page 18"

From KellyGang
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Text replacement - "MediaWiki:Sidebar" to "<sidebar>MediaWiki:Sidebar</sidebar>")
m (Text replacement - "'''''' === full text ===" to "{{Full Text}}")
Line 5: Line 5:
 
== The Royal Commission evidence for 23/3/1881 ==
 
== The Royal Commission evidence for 23/3/1881 ==
  
''''''
+
{{Full Text}}
 
+
=== full text ===
+
  
 
(see also introduction to [[Untitled Document|day 1]] ) '''Captain [[Standish|Standish]] giving evidence'''
 
(see also introduction to [[Untitled Document|day 1]] ) '''Captain [[Standish|Standish]] giving evidence'''

Revision as of 22:00, 20 November 2015

Story of the KellyGang - the Royal Commission evidence

previous page / next page

The Royal Commission evidence for 23/3/1881

(full text transcription)

(see also introduction to day 1 ) Captain Standish giving evidence

183 Had you not occasion to remove him from Schnapper Point up to the North Eastern District?- No; the incidents that came to my knowledge afterwards occurred at Schnapper Point, but I never had information of them till after he was sent to Benalla.

184 Are you not aware that for some years, a considerable number of years back, the Beechworth district has been unfortunate through various circumstances, in the officers stationed there, officers dying, and through frequent changes of officers, peculiarly so?- I do not know what you are talking about.

185 Are you not aware that for some years, a considerable number of years back, the Beechworth district has been unfortunate in the officers stationed there, officers dying, and through frequent changes of officers, peculiarly so?- There were one or two; Mr. Barkley, in charge, died. What has that to do with this case ?

186 By the Commission. -Was it more so than any other district?- I am not aware of it. At one time it was necessary to remove one or two men from a certain part of the district, but there was not a general removal of all hands.

187 By Mr. Nicolson. -Were there not officers removed from time to time?- So they are in any district state whom you refer to.

188 I refer to a series of officers?- Then speak out; none of your mysterious hints about officers.

189 Are you not aware-I have a delicacy in mentioning the officers, because many of them are dead, but I will furnish a list of them-you know whom I refer to?- I do not know; that is utterly untrue. I do not know whom you refer to; mention the name, then I will admit it. Why not speak out like a man instead of hemming and hawing and hesitating ?

190 Who was the superintendent of the district previous to Mr. Sadleir?- Mr. Barkley, of the Beechworth district. You know all these things. Why cannot you mention them yourself ?

191 I am examining you. I cannot?- You are talking nonsense.

192 Who was there before Mr. Barkley?- I cannot remember.

193 Was there not a Mr. Wilson?- He was there after. I do not believe it was immediately before Mr. Barkley.

194 Was there not a Mr. Purcell there?- He was, but not in charge of the district.

195 By the Commission. -Was he superintendent?- No.

196 By Mr. Nicolson. -Was there not one superintendent there for twelve months-I mean Mr. Chomley?- He was there.

197 Do you remember my making an inspection of that district in 1878?- I remember you made an inspection of the district some time before this happened, but I must say I did not attach much importance to any of your reports. They were all merely twaddle.

198 Do you remember my reporting Greta station to you?- Yes.

199 What did I recommend?- I cannot remember. I have not seen the papers.

200 Do you remember my reporting the men and recommending their removal?- No.

201 Did I recommend Thorn's removal?- Yes.

202 Do you remember the establishment of the Glenmore station?- Yes.

203 Do you remember the proposal to abolish Glenmore?- It was of very little use that station.

Previous page / Next page


 ! The text has been retyped from a microfiche copy of the original.

We have taken care to reproduce this document but areas of the original text may been damaged.

We also apologise for any typographical errors.

The next day . . . Royal Commission index