Royal Commission report 16/6/1881

From KellyGang
Jump to: navigation, search

Story of the KellyGang - the Royal Commission 16/6/1881

day before next day

 
Question number Date Witness
11866 - 11979 16/6/1881 Sup Sadlier
11980 - 11996 16/6/1881 Insp O'Connor
11997 - 12079 16/6/1881 Ass Com Nicolson
     
1717 - 1979

1980 - 2120

2452 - 2744

2745 - 3004

4681 - 4687

11866 - 11979

12559 - 12565

16657.1 - 16860

17688 - 17786

7/4/1881

12/4/1881

13/4/1881

14/4/1881

10/5/1881

16/6/1881

29/6/1881

6/9/1881

20/9/1881

See these dates for other evidence given by Sup Sadleir
     
1066 - 1103

1104 - 1234

1235 - 1237

11432 - 11540

11541 - 11543

11764 - 11865

29/3/1881

30/3/1881

31/3/1881

14/6/1881

15/6/1881

15/6/1881

See these dates for other evidence given by Insp O'Connor
325 - 675

676 - 915

916 -1065

11997

16861

17787a

24/3/1881

25/3/1881

29/3/1881

16/6/1881

7/9/1881

20/9/1881

See these dates for other evidence given by Ass Com Nicolson
     
Appendix Title
20 Minutes of Proceedings at Meetings Held by the Royal Commission
   

'

Summary of the evidence on day 31 of the hearings

16/6/1881, Sup Sadleir continued his evidence - some brief highlights

Sup Sadleir was cross examined by Insp O'Connor on evidence that Sup Sadleir showed a want of courage

Why did Insp Brooke Smith get sent on a long patrol?

Was Standish interested in hunting after the KellyGang?

Who would take a novel and commence to read when people wanted to talk to him/

What was Standish really like?

16/6/1881, Insp O'Connor continued his evidence - some brief highlights

Insp O'Connor was asked about the skiils of his trackers and in particular whether they are considered more efficient in small detachments or singly for tracking purposes.

16/6/1881, Ass Com Nicolson continued his evidence -

'

some brief highlights

Ass Com Nicolson was cross examined by Insp O'Connor


 ! The text has been retyped from a microfiche copy of the original.

We have taken care to reproduce this document but areas of the original text may been damaged.

We also apologise for any typographical errors.

day before . . . the next day . . . Royal Commission index