Create the page "Zincke" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
Page title matches
- == Importance of William Lawrence Zincke == ...worth and in 1863 I established my legal practice in Beechworth in 1863 as Zincke and Martin5 KB (753 words) - 20:55, 20 November 2015
Page text matches
- Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zinke]] (for the other accused) was asked to agree to the remand of the ...of them, however, are perfectly innocent of any such intention, and, as Mr Zincke said in this particular, it is but fair that the wheat should be separated6 KB (913 words) - 15:46, 20 November 2015
- ...them, and two clergymen and other old inhabitants of the district, with Mr Zincke, a member of Parliament, all gave these men (sheep stealers) an exemplary c7 KB (1,158 words) - 15:46, 20 November 2015
- Mr [[William Zincke MP|ZINCKE]] proposed the toast of "The Parliament" Messrs. ANDERSON and WAL5 KB (851 words) - 21:06, 20 November 2015
- Cross examined by [[William Zincke MP|MrZincke]] - Dan did not refuse to be arrested. Had not a warrant with m7 KB (1,285 words) - 21:05, 20 November 2015
- ...ed to Euroa. Superintendent Sadleir prosecuted, and Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] appeared for M'Monigan.4 KB (731 words) - 21:05, 20 November 2015
- ...W. H. [[Foster|Foster]] PM today (Saturday). We learned that Mr. [[William Zincke MP|Zinke]] will appear to defend a number of them and it is said that Mr. A8 KB (1,451 words) - 15:41, 20 November 2015
- Mr '''F Brown''' appeared for the two Stewarts, and Mr W [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] and Mr Albert Read for the rest. Mr. Zincke argued that the prisoner had a right to inspect every document connected wi5 KB (723 words) - 21:05, 20 November 2015
- Mr. Zincke objected to this course as, with a view to ulterior proceedings, he must ha Cross-examined by Mr. Zincke. - If the information I received be correct, the prisoner is an ally of the5 KB (878 words) - 21:04, 20 November 2015
- ...dare not give evidence. The remand was strongly opposed by Messrs Read and Zincke, but the Bench granted it for eight days, at the end of which time Mr Bowma3 KB (470 words) - 21:04, 20 November 2015
- ...er witnesses. The application was strenuously opposed by Messrs Bowman and Zincke who urged that a de- finite agreement had been made with Superintendent Sad ...e''' appeared to prosecute on behalf of the Crown, while Messrs Bowman and Zincke defended some of the prisoners.5 KB (728 words) - 21:06, 20 November 2015
- ...d either go on with the charge against the prisoners, or withdraw them. Mr Zincke agreed to this course, and at the same time said, "Don't let us have a ...in making the agreement, but he sat between Superintendent Sadleir and Mr Zincke, and distinctly heard it made.4 KB (724 words) - 21:05, 20 November 2015
- Mr '''Zincke''' said that he could understand in what an unpleasant position the police4 KB (749 words) - 21:05, 20 November 2015
- Mr '''Zincke'''. - It is already rumoured that several more men are ready and willing to Mr '''Zincke'''. - Why not apply for his committal?4 KB (721 words) - 21:05, 20 November 2015
- Mr '''Bowman''' and Mr '''Zincke''' then left the court, and the prisoner was remanded. The following prison4 KB (561 words) - 21:05, 20 November 2015
- ...lf of the Crown, and Messrs. [[Bowman (2)|Bowman]] and [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] on behalf of some of the prisoners. Mr '''Zincke''' said that although he did not appear on behalf of that prisoner he might4 KB (601 words) - 21:05, 20 November 2015
- ...le lauding the police magistrate to the sky, while another one said he (Mr Zincke) was deserving of great reprobation for having used words unfit for any pra ...d. Had such a remark been made in court the consequences referred to by Mr Zincke would have been well deserved. As to the prisoner's case and the applicatio4 KB (646 words) - 21:05, 20 November 2015
- ...ward some evidence. Mr Bowman said it was Mr Sadleir's own proposition. Mr Zincke had asked Mr Foster to arbitrate. ...id his position was a difficult one, and there was great weight in what Mr Zincke and Mr Bowman said.7 KB (1,242 words) - 21:04, 20 November 2015
- ...time remanded without any evidence being brought forward by the police. Mr Zincke expressed his intention of taking the case to the Supreme Court and testing ...]] and Furnell represented the Crown, and Messrs [[Bowman (2)|Bowman]] and Zincke the accused.9 KB (1,637 words) - 15:39, 20 November 2015
- ...us]] Mr Wyatt said this was an ''ad captandum'' argument, not worthy of Mr Zincke. A man could swear an information on information received, and he would sca Mr Zincke continued: The police swore that they had heard a man say he had seen the K8 KB (1,140 words) - 15:43, 20 November 2015
- Mr [[William Zincke MP|ZINCKE]] said he did not care what was done that day, as he had taken steps to hav3 KB (456 words) - 21:04, 20 November 2015
- ...e perfectly innocent of any such intention, and, as Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] said in this particular, it is but fair that the wheat should be separate [[John McElroy|John Mcllroy]] was then brought forward, and Mr Zincke, who appeared for him, said he was not there to repeat a thrice told tale,7 KB (1,150 words) - 15:38, 20 November 2015
- ...ee grounds he thought it necessary to state his views-first, because of Mr Zincke's application; second, because Mr Furnell was the third superintendent of p3 KB (500 words) - 21:05, 20 November 2015
- Mr '''Wyatt''' said Mr Zincke had spoken about the need of separating the chaff from the wheat in the cas Mr. '''Zincke''' said there had been already sufficient declamation and argument. The pol4 KB (625 words) - 21:05, 20 November 2015
- ...ntended to make the remands for a short period, but Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] had intimated to him he required a remand for a week, in order to enable ...e grounds he thought it necessary to state his views. First, because of Mr Zincke’s application. Second, because Mr Furnell was the third Superintendant of9 KB (1,624 words) - 15:41, 20 November 2015
- ...ntended to make the remands for a short period, but Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] had intimated to him he required a remand for a week, in order to enable ...e grounds he thought it necessary to state his views. First, because of Mr Zincke’s application. Second, because Mr Furnell was the third Superintendant of8 KB (1,309 words) - 15:40, 20 November 2015
- Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] desired to call the attention of the Bench to the fact that the man had a3 KB (427 words) - 21:05, 20 November 2015
- ...he fact that on the 11th of January when he first remanded the men, he (Mr Zincke) objected, and Mr Foster thought some evidence should be called, and remand4 KB (622 words) - 21:05, 20 November 2015
- Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]], for accused, desired to call the attention of the Bench to the fact that9 KB (1,567 words) - 15:42, 20 November 2015
- ...ring to himself. He was also remanded for the same period as the others Mr Zincke, who appeared in his case, also protested.3 KB (492 words) - 21:06, 20 November 2015
- Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] appeared for the whole of the eight prisoners, who were brought up two an Mr Zincke protested, as these men had already served a sentence of nine weeks, and no4 KB (585 words) - 21:04, 20 November 2015
- Superintendent Furnell conducted the prosecution; Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] appearing for the whole of the eight accused men. Mr Zincke protested that the men had already served a sentence of nine weeks, and on6 KB (1,045 words) - 15:39, 20 November 2015
- ...the prisoners should be remanded for another week. Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] opposed the application, and protested that it was both unjust and illega ...ategory:1879]] [[Category:sympathizers]] [[Category:Mr Foster]] [[Category:Zincke]] [[Category:history]]2 KB (213 words) - 21:00, 20 November 2015
- ...ategory:1879]] [[Category:sympathizers]] [[Category:Mr Foster]] [[Category:Zincke]] [[Category:history]]4 KB (647 words) - 20:59, 20 November 2015
- ...ategory:1879]] [[Category:sympathizers]] [[Category:Mr Foster]] [[Category:Zincke]] [[Category:history]]3 KB (410 words) - 21:00, 20 November 2015
- ...counsel for the accused, and on the application of Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]], a remand until Saturday next was granted (bail to be enlarged) much to t2 KB (252 words) - 15:45, 20 November 2015
- WL [[William Zincke MP|ZINCKE]]9 KB (1,404 words) - 15:45, 20 November 2015
- ...political programme of the Attorney General and of Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]], during the election campaign now commenced, as it is terrible to think t6 KB (1,120 words) - 15:45, 20 November 2015
- ...very quiet, and has been see only by the clerk for Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]], the solicitor, who will appear for him. His removal so suddenly quite su3 KB (486 words) - 21:19, 20 November 2015
- ...standing on the balcony at the time among whom were Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]], MLA, and also [[Ellen Sherritt|Mrs Aaron Sherritt]] and her mother, but5 KB (767 words) - 15:45, 20 November 2015
- ...nterviews with Mr Gaunson. It was at first proposed that Mr Gaunson and Mr Zincke should work together, but eventually it was determined to rely on Mr Gaunso4 KB (647 words) - 21:19, 20 November 2015
- ...unicated with Mr D [[Gaunson, David|Gaunson]], desiring him to act with Mr Zincke. The latter on hearing this, at once retired from the case. The friends see7 KB (1,217 words) - 15:27, 20 November 2015
- ...sed with him freely. In reply to Mr Gaunson, Kelly said he had informed Mr Zincke that he had employed a new solicitor. Mr Gaunson will apply for a remand fo7 KB (1,334 words) - 15:40, 20 November 2015
- ...oncerned in the defence, and will probably come up by train to-night. Mr Zincke has thrown up all responsibility, in the case. In all probability, in con4 KB (718 words) - 15:45, 20 November 2015
- ...ith him in Melbourne and Beechworth. He referred to Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]], who had been afforded many opportunities of consulting with the prisoner6 KB (986 words) - 21:04, 20 November 2015
- ...misled. The latter he sent for Mrs Skillian through Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] was of an unimportant character, and simply asked for some change of clot5 KB (801 words) - 15:45, 20 November 2015
- ...t was made concerning both himself (Mr Gaunson) and Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]], the whole of which was absolutely untrue. This was grossly and manifestl5 KB (922 words) - 21:06, 20 November 2015
- ...his toilette properly before appearing in court and before the public, Mr Zincke, however, having been immediately superseded thereafter by Mr Gaunson as th ...atement in my report which may not be literally correct is the one that Mr Zincke was asked to act for the prisoner in company with Mr Gaunson. That statemen5 KB (862 words) - 21:06, 20 November 2015
- ...olen from Mr Whitty, in the neighbourhood of Greta. Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] was engaged to defend the accused, and the defence was that they were inn6 KB (1,027 words) - 15:41, 20 November 2015
- ...een made public, but it has been of such a nature that [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] has thrown up the case, and positively declined to have anything more to ...anner with the political party in the Assembly of which he is a member. Mr Zincke warmly resented such a proposal, I am told, and threw up the case.5 KB (820 words) - 21:00, 20 November 2015
- It is stated that the cause of the rupture with Mr Zincke results from the inability of the latter whether from political or private ...ts of the spoil, the friends of the outlaw desire to unearth it, and as Mr Zincke could not obtain from the Government the favors that have been given to Mr3 KB (454 words) - 21:00, 20 November 2015
- .... Inspector Montfort conducted the prosecution, and Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] appeared for the prisoners.3 KB (498 words) - 21:04, 20 November 2015
- ...nst them, and two clergymen and other inhabitants of the district with Mr. Zincke, a member of Parliament, all gave those men an exemplary character.5 KB (902 words) - 21:03, 20 November 2015
- ...Kelly|Ned Kelly]] after a committal hearing held in Benalla. Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zinke]] from Beechworth appeared for the accused, [[Chomley (2)|Chomley]5 KB (639 words) - 15:33, 20 November 2015
- [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] William19 KB (2,421 words) - 15:28, 20 November 2015
- ...3 months gaol that we expected. We had to pay 20/- with 1/6 costs plus Mr Zincke's fee. This was my first run in with the likes of Mr '''Butler''' the magis34 KB (5,752 words) - 20:55, 20 November 2015
- ...l that we expected. We had to pay 20/- for the fine with 1/6 costs plus Mr Zincke's fee. Mr Wicks was a nice man with 4 children to look after by himself27 KB (4,526 words) - 15:50, 20 November 2015
- Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] represented me at the remand hearings, see ([[The Ovens and Murray Advert4 KB (549 words) - 20:55, 20 November 2015
- When I was trying to join the police [[William Zincke MP|William Zincke]] gave me a good reference ([[Royal Commission report day 48 page 18|RC166020 KB (3,293 words) - 20:54, 20 November 2015
- I did not want Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]]. ([[The Age (30)|Age6/8/80]]) I sent Ned a letter recommending Gaunson wh18 KB (3,050 words) - 20:54, 20 November 2015
- == Importance of William Lawrence Zincke == ...worth and in 1863 I established my legal practice in Beechworth in 1863 as Zincke and Martin5 KB (753 words) - 20:55, 20 November 2015
- ...ing his horse. The case was heard by Magistrate '''Butler'''. Mr [[William Zincke MP|Zinckle]] defended Joe Byrne. Magistrate '''Butler''' also heard the cas5 KB (748 words) - 15:12, 20 November 2015
- William [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]],15 KB (2,045 words) - 23:50, 20 November 2015
- ...enalla|Pow]] , [[Beechworth|Read]] , [[Smyth|Smyth]] , [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] ,8 KB (1,097 words) - 15:50, 20 November 2015
- At the start it was thought that William [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] would represent Ned Kelly at his commital in Beechworth. See also details31 KB (5,188 words) - 15:50, 20 November 2015
- [[William Zincke MP|Zincke]] William, MP2 KB (200 words) - 15:50, 20 November 2015